|
...by Armstrong|Shank ART Director BRUCE HINEL |
|||
| Desktop publishing has created a best-of-times-worst-of-times situation for advertisers.
While the decreased cost of computers and graphics software has given most companies an affordable way to produce communications materials in-house, it has also left many of them with the unfortunate impression that creating good advertising is as easy as owning good equipment. This is like saying you can become an aircraft mechanic by purchasing a hangar full of tools and technical manuals. Designers go to school for four years, then spend another two to three in the work place learning to apply literally thousands of art and software “tricks” to the psychology of advertising.
The ease with which ineffective advertising can be produced these days makes it more critical than ever for business owners and marketing directors to sharpen their graphic judgment skills. I’m not trying to put down consumer-friendly graphics software; it has its applications. But the ease with which ineffective advertising can be produced these days makes it more critical than ever for business owners and marketing directors to sharpen their graphic judgment skills. Here are some general ideas to kick around next time you look over an ad, logo, brochure, newsletter or any other “designed” piece intended to represent your company or product:
|
These guidelines can help you focus your assessments of graphic design. It’s equally important to focus the purpose of a piece, before writing and layout ever begin, then to remain faithful tothat purpose as the work progresses. Every piece has a specific application-a desired result toward which every design decision should contribute. Don’t try to combine all your purposes into one “great” piece because the viewer may miss the real message entirely. “But come on,” you’re probably thinking. “How much difference can good design really make? Why pay a marketing firm’s designers to manage and execute your company’s image, when you could do it yourself for a lot less?” I’ll answer that question with a question: Why do companies with professional, consistent and appropriate graphic images have names like Coca Cola, Ford and Microsoft? |
||
© 2008 ARMSTRONG|SHANK ADVERTISING , IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM VIEWING THIS PAGE, PLEASE CONTACT SUPPORT@ARMSTRONGSHANK.COM. |
|||